How do I know the difference between Murder and Manslaughter in scenarios?

Firstly, we would need to establish whether the person in question had the mens rea, or a guilty mind. With murder, the mens rea is plain, you need to have intended to kill a person or cause Grievous bodily harm, whereas with Manslaughter it is not as black and white. Manslaughter is the 'recklessness' of murder, it requires you to have taken a risk, or at least known that death could've occured but not necessarily that you intended to kill someone.

For example, "Jayden cut Brody's car brakes, intending for him to be seriously injured but Brody crashed and suffered serious head injuries resulting in death" - In this, Jayden would be liable for murder as he intended to cause Grievous bodily harm by cutting the brakes.

However, if the scenario proceeded as "Jayden, a car mechanic, saw that something was wrong with Brody's brakes however did not fix them and let Brody drive off. As Brody was driving home, his brakes stopped working, resulting in him crashing and dying" - In this Jayden did not intend for Brody to die, but took a risk that if his brakes did not work, he may crash and die. Murder is an intention whereas manslaughter is a knowledge of risk.

LO
Answered by Lily O. Law tutor

9842 Views

See similar Law A Level tutors

Related Law A Level answers

All answers ▸

What is the Literal rule?


What is the doctrine of precedent? / What are its advantages and disadvantages?


Explain two reasons why the ratio decidendi of a case may sometimes be difficult to establish.


How satisfactory is the current law on contractual terms? Consider what reforms might improve the law. You may relate your answer to terms in general, or to terms excluding or limiting liability, or to a combination of both.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2025 by IXL Learning