Should the government intervene in cases of market failure?

The benefits of government intervention are largely dependent on the type of government intervention and the form of market failure it hopes to correct, however it is normally beneficial for the government to intervene when market failure arises. There are many forms of government intervention in a market for example, introducing taxes or subsidies, creating price flaws and price ceilings and banning the sale of the product. When the market fails it usually results in negative impacts for society whether this be negative externalities or lack of consumption, and therefore should arguably be corrected. Due to the nature of markets it is likely that it will be corrected by anything but the government and therefore in most cases the government should intervene when markets fail.

GF
Answered by Gabrielle F. Economics tutor

7080 Views

See similar Economics IB tutors

Related Economics IB answers

All answers ▸

Using a diagram, show how a polluting factory may cause a negative externality to society, and how a tax might be used to solve this market failure.


Outline the differences between the GDP, real GDP and green GDP.


Explain how fiscal policy could be employed to pull an economy out of a recessionary gap


Qd=420-30P. From this equation identify the slope of the demand function and calculate the price at 60 units.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2025 by IXL Learning