Briefly explain the intentionalist-functionalist debate concerning the Holocaust.

The internationalist theory of the holocaust states that Hitler had already planned the systematic annihilation of the Jewish population, even back during his imprisonment after the Munich Hall Putch in the 1920’s. His statements in Mein Kampf and his rhetoric in his speeches was filled with anti-semitism and statements which directed towards the “master plan”. This view is supported by a vast amount of historians, including Ian Kershaw and Lucy Dawidowicz. The functionalist approach, on the other hand, claims that the holocaust was a product of the Second World War, suggesting that there was no master plan. The aim was merely to transfer the Jewish population out of the country, thus establishing the master race. Once this was not feasible, genocide was viewed as the only alternative. This view is supported by Christopher Browning and Saul Friedlander.

Answered by Irene K. History tutor

9261 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

Assess the reasons why Northern hostility towards the South grew in the years 1850–1861.


How accurate is it to say that the Weimar Republic never enjoyed popular support?


Why was the Maastricht treaty so hard to pass?


'The USSR experienced it's most significant economic decline under Brezhnev'


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2024

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences