What are Descartes' three waves of doubt and his response to it?

Descartes went through three increasingly strong arguments in an attempt to bring doubt to every single thing that he knew. The first is the argument from illusion, in which he suggests that his senses may deceive him as to what he experiences (Draw diagram as a memory aid). In his next argument he strengthens this by questioning whether everything he knows and has experienced was really just a dream (another diagram). Finally, responding to the solution that God would not deceive, he argues that God may not exist, and instead an evil demon may have been deceiving him at every turn. (third diagram to represent this). Descartes solution to this issue is expressed through the phrase: cogito ergo sum - I think therefore I am. The meaning behind this is that, according to Descartes' reasoning, the evil demon can never convince him that he does not think. If he is thinks he doesn't think, he must be thinking, and so it is impossible for him not to be a thinking thing. From there he makes the simple leap that if he thinks, he must exist as a thinking thing. Whether this is a sound jump in logic is a question which explores the topic in greater depth, for exam questions which require debate and evaluation as opposed to just explaining a theory.

Related Philosophy A Level answers

All answers ▸

Briefly outline the tripartite view of knowledge and explain how a case of a lucky true belief (a Gettier-style problem) can be used to argue against this view


How do you structure an argument against a theory? (E.g. Utilitarianism)


Explain why Jeremy Bentham's Hedonic Calculus seeks to determine a moral cause of action


How should I structure a 25 marker concerning Utilitarianism?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo
Cookie Preferences