Explain Hume's distinction between matters of fact and relations of ideas (5)

David Hume, an empiricist, separated knowledge into categories - "matters of fact" and "relations of ideas".

Hume argues that every affirmation which is certain, such as geometry, arithmetic and algebra, fall under "relations of ideas". For example, the fact that the square to the hypotenuse is equal to the square of two sides is a relation of ideas. These facts are a priori knowledge and therefore can be known simply through pure reasoning. According to Hume, they are not significant and do not tell us anything about the world. 

"Matters of fact", on the other hand, contain a posteriori knowledge and are therefore synthetic propositions that tell us about the world. They are not certain and are based on sensory experience and cause and effect. Matters of fact are contingent truths, such as that Donald Trump is the President of the USA - this is not always going to be true. 

AE
Answered by Amy E. Philosophy tutor

48022 Views

See similar Philosophy A Level tutors

Related Philosophy A Level answers

All answers ▸

How would you outline the Knowledge argument?


Briefly outline the tripartite view of knowledge and explain how a case of a lucky true belief (a Gettier-style problem) can be used to argue against this view


What is utilitarianism?


'Explain how an act utilitarian would make a moral decision'


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences