Explain why the verb ‘mettre’ in its past tense form as it appears in the following sentence “Il a décroché la casserole et l’a mise sur la table” has a feminine ending or terminaison (despite the auxiliary’s verb ‘avoir’’s neutrality)?

Generally the past participle doesn’t agree with any noun when the auxiliary verb ‘avoir’ is used. For example: ‘Elles ont acheté des bottes’ despite the subject ‘elles’ and the direct object ‘bottes’ being feminine and plural. 

Notwithstanding, when the direct object precedes the past participle verb, the latter agrees with it: ‘J’ai rangé les bottes qu’elles avaient achetées’. 

In the majority of cases, the conjunction ‘que’ which refers back to the direct object prompts this change in verb/noun agreement. 

In the initial question, ‘l’a mise’ refers back to the casserole. 

CH

Related French GCSE answers

All answers ▸

Please could you explain to me when past participles must agree when using the passé composé? (NB in my experience, this was an issue for A-Level students of French too)


Traduisez en français : The government could help by creating more jobs.


Que faites-vous pour protéger l'environnement?


I keep seeing words such as 'soit' instead of 'est' in texts and I don't understand what it is and why it's there, could you explain?