How should I analyse a primary source?

Primary sources offer you the chance to engage with a true piece of History - instead of taking a textbook's word, you can formulate your own opinion on the matter. Start by asking yourself what the source is saying, on a basic level. Identifying the immediate message will help you to understand the reception it may have received. For now, forget about your own knowledge on the era, and focus on what you can learn from just the source. This will be your first paragraph.

Now it's time to bring in your own historical knowledge. Think about how the source compares to any other primary sources you have seen, and think about whether it corroborates or contradicts your own knowledge. This will help us to discuss the "why?" section. Consider the possible motivations the source might have. This will help us to decide its usefulness. This can be a second paragraph.

Finally, think about how these observations give us an insight into the period. Consider how the source has expanded your understanding, and note where it has been less useful. This will form a conclusion.

Answered by Tristan B. History tutor

1436 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

How would I structure/answer a question on 'The Communist rulers were effective autocrats; the Tsars were not'


Who was Stalin?


What are important points to consider when being asked to analyse the usefulness of a primary source?


How do/make I do a high-level conclusion?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2024

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences