How far could the historian make use of sources x and y together to investigate z

Investigating sources in conjunction with each other requires the employment of many of the skills used in analysing a single source, be that primary or secondary, but with a few key differences. 'Cross-referencing' is the most important thing here, not only regarding how the context of the sources differ (i.e. what they say, the facts they present), but concerning the authors (their affinities, prejudices, experiences etc.), the date of the source in relation to the date of the event concerned, and perhaps most importantly, the purpose (tone) and nature of the sources. Obviously, the uniqueness of the sources will require a more in depth analysis, but as a general overview there are certainly some things to avoid. It's poor analysis to disregard a source from a partisan author, for fear of it being "biased" - Similarly, two sources that agree on the significance/course/legacy on an event do not necessarily make them more 'reliable' when used together. The trick is, not only to cross-reference the two sources, but within those sources cross-reference the 'elements' (purpose, audience, nature, date, authorship). It's sounds tricky, but soon becomes second nature.

Answered by Fred L. History tutor

7111 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

How far was Stalin responsible for the start of the Cold War by 1949?


How should I plan my revision for a History A Level?


Assess the view that US involvement in the First World War did more to advance women’s rights that any other factor in the period from 1865 to 1992.


“Between 1547 and 1558 England was torn apart by religious revolution” Discuss


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2024

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences