Translate the following sentence: Caesar barbaros trans flumen oppugnavit

First thing is to find the nominative, which in this case is Caesar. Then the main verb which is oppugnavit. You should identify the tense and person of the verb, here it is past tense and 3rd person singular, agreeing with Caesar. So already the sentence reads 'Caesar attacked'. Now to find the object of this verb if there is one, which is a word in the accusative with usual transitive verbs. Barbaros fits the criteria here, but also flumen, as that is accusative as well. The distinguishing factor here is 'trans', which takes the accusative (flumen). Trans means across, so 'Caesar attacked the river across the barbarians' doesn't make sense, or is less realistic than 'Caesar attacked the barbarians across the river'.

Answered by Alex H. Latin tutor

1723 Views

See similar Latin GCSE tutors

Related Latin GCSE answers

All answers ▸

Why are different cases of the personal pronoun use in the two parts of the sentence "si enim amici me in caelo videbunt, omnes tandem mihi credent" and what do they mean?


What are the different ways you can make a purpose clause?


What's an Ablative Absolute?


(i) Identify the ablative absolute and (ii) translate the sentence into good English: 'Urbe capta, hostes cives occiderunt.'


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo
Cookie Preferences