Intro: Whilst the other side of the argument holds some value, it is more likely that due to this this and this, this argument is true. As political scientist has argued “……..”, Subsequently, this essay will argue that …………… (and it will repeat this at the end of every paragraph). Body of essay: 3 sections - multiple paragraphs: Some scholars have argued that the opposing argument to the one which I am arguing is correct. Such as political scientist says ‘…..’. There is evidence for this. Such as this, and that. It is also the case that this and that. However, the problem with this argument (as scholar points out) is that ANALYSIS. This can be seen with these 4-6 pieces of detailed evidence … As a result my thesis …. seems more valid. My thesis is also more valid because of this piece of analysis - found here in the constitution. As seen with these 4-6 pieces of evidence and these bits of analysis. Conclusion: one area of ambiguity - why your thesis is the most plausible explanation