What is the difference between the meanings of the perfect and imperfect tenses?

The perfect and imperfect tenses in latin are both used to describe actions which take place in the past, but they are used to describe slightly different types of actions.
The perfect is used to describe actions that have been completed, or happen entirely in the past. You can translate the perfect in a few ways but the most common are 'I arrived' or 'I have arrived'. In English sometimes you can use 'did' to translate the perfect too e.g. 'I did arrive early'.
The imperfect on the other hand describes actions which had no particular start or end point, or have not been completed. The imperfect often translates to English 'I was arriving' or 'I used to arrive' but sometimes its best to translate it with the simple past 'I arrived'.

Answered by Eleanor S. Latin tutor

1383 Views

See similar Latin GCSE tutors

Related Latin GCSE answers

All answers ▸

What are the endings for the active pluperfect tense?


This exercise is based on adverbs in Latin. Translate the following into English, identifying the subject, object, verb and adverb: puella donum laete accepit.


Marcus pugnabat Flavium quod iratus erat. Translate and parse the verbs (giving the person, number, tense, mood, voice)


Translate: Nisus erat miles fortis. Amicum habebat, Euryalum nomine, quem maxime amabat. Postquam Graeci urbem Troiam ceperunt, Nisus Euryalusque ad Italiam cum paucis aliis Troianis fugerunt. Ibi invenerunt multos hostes, qui Troianos delere volebant.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2024

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences