What is the difference between the meanings of the perfect and imperfect tenses?

The perfect and imperfect tenses in latin are both used to describe actions which take place in the past, but they are used to describe slightly different types of actions.
The perfect is used to describe actions that have been completed, or happen entirely in the past. You can translate the perfect in a few ways but the most common are 'I arrived' or 'I have arrived'. In English sometimes you can use 'did' to translate the perfect too e.g. 'I did arrive early'.
The imperfect on the other hand describes actions which had no particular start or end point, or have not been completed. The imperfect often translates to English 'I was arriving' or 'I used to arrive' but sometimes its best to translate it with the simple past 'I arrived'.

ES
Answered by Eleanor S. Latin tutor

2253 Views

See similar Latin GCSE tutors

Related Latin GCSE answers

All answers ▸

rex Aegypti duos liberos habebat. hi liberi erant Cleopatra et Ptolemaeus. per multos annos liberi vitam laetam cum patre habebant. deinde post mortem patris Cleopatra erat regina. [passage taken from sample paper, own questions below]


What is the difference between a deponent and a semi-deponent verb?


"dux Gallorum timebat ne Romani viros collem ascendentes audirent." How would I go about translating this sentence?


How do I form a Purpose Clause in Latin?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2026 by IXL Learning