Compare and contrast geostationary and low polar orbits.

Geostationary orbits are only possible at one distance from Earth. This is because the very nature of the geostationary orbit requires the satellite to have the same time period as the rotational period of the Earth. In contrast, a low polar orbit can exist at a number of different distances and tends to have an orbital period of twelve hours as opposed to twenty four. Geostationary satellites remain in the same place relative to Earth and low polar satellites move, covering every part of the Earth's surface in only a short time frame. This difference helps to separate the orbits into different applications; geostationary satellites are good for communication as the satellite does not need to be tracked and a constant signal can be maintained. In contrast, the low polar satellite is better for surveillance as it covers so much ground.

TH

Related Physics A Level answers

All answers ▸

How would we calculate the distance covered by a train that starts at rest, then accelerates to 5km/hr in 30 mins then stays at this constant speed for 12 minutes?


How might you use sound waves to smash a glass? What are other examples of resonance in everyday life?


Bernard says that a mass executing uniform circular motion is not accelerating as it's speed is not changing. Which parts of his statement are correct and which are false. For those which are false state why they are and give the correct version.


What is an equipotential in an electric/gravitational field?