Two forces of 4N and 10N act on a body. Which of the following could not be the resultant magnitude? (14N, 7N, 6N, 3N)

My first thought when dealing with resultant forces is to try out the most common combinations: combined and opposite. In this case 10N + 4N = 14N and 10N - 4N = 6N. This tactic does rule out two of the answers, but we are still left wondering what is the difference between the remaining answers: 7N and 3N. Why those two options were given? If, say, 7N is obtainable, then how?The trick to "which one is not" questions is to think in terms of boundaries, not values. By their nature, such questions imply that a whole range of values exists and your job is to figure out the boundaries of that range. There is an infinite number of angles that those two forces can be acting at, but the edge cases we have looked at before provide us with the maximum and minimum values of that range. Therefore, 3N is not obtainable, since, no matter the configuration, 10N - 4N = 6N is the absolute minimum resultant force.

AJ
Answered by Aleksandr J. Physics tutor

9064 Views

See similar Physics A Level tutors

Related Physics A Level answers

All answers ▸

A 80kg man is hanging from two 1.5m ropes that lie at 60 degrees from the horizontal. What is the tension in each rope required to prevent the man from dropping?


How can the average speedx of a gas molecule be derived?


Compare and contrast geostationary and low polar orbits.


A student heats a bar of chocolate in the microwave for one minute. When they remove the bar they observe that there are patches of melted chocolate with unmelted chocolate between them. Suggest the mechanism of how this happens.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2026 by IXL Learning