To what extent did Russian rulers modernise during the period 1855-1964?

During the period 1855-1964, all Russian rulers attempted to modernise the country economically and in instances, politically, but not at the expense of losing control over the populace. The failure of Alexander III to politically modernise as evidenced through the rejection of the Loris Melikov proposals pales in comparison to the failure of Nicholas II through the rejection of Industrial Committees which sabotaged the longterm war effort. Stalin and Lenin modernised the economy marginally. The NEP of Lenin which moved away from forced grain acquisitions and the introduction of a farmers tax and increased output and living standards was undoubtedly successful, but represented a progressive policy rather than a form of modernisation. Stalin pursued an especially active approach through successive five year plans. The end result of these was the system of collectivisation and vast construction projects such as the Dnieper Dam and the city of Magnitogorsk. The most willing and successful rulers in terms of modernising the country were Alexander II and Khrushchev. Alexander II vitally modernised society through the abolition of serfdom which could revolutionise the rural economy, Khrushchev increased agricultural output by over 50% of the 1953 harvest through the Virgin Lands scheme and transformed the economy into one focused on increasing domestic living standards through the focus on consumer goods and the doubling of the housing stock.
However the modernisation aims of Russian rules clearly were not all the same, indeed Nicholas II actively avoided modernisation. Lenin and Stalin were motivated to pursue modernisation in order to increase the control the 'party' exerted over the state. Alexander II and Khrushchev both had the most altruistic motivations to modernise, yet it can be argued that Khrushchev aimed to increase personal power and it could be argued that the positives which emerged from his pursuit of modernisation were mere fortunate byproducts of his real intention to increase his own power over the state.

Answered by Edward P. History tutor

4127 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

How would I structure a 24 mark essay?


Assess the short term significance of Malcolm X in reducing racial discrimination.


How do I structure my A- level History essay?


'The personalities of the early Stuart monarchs were responsible for a breakdown in relations betweeen Crown and Parliament in the years 1604 to 1629' Assess the validity of this view. [25]


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences