Give two criticisms of Bowlby's 44 thieves study

One major issue with the research conducted by John Bowlby is that there is bias and subjectivity in his findings. Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation was constructed prior to the research being carried out. Consequently, Bowlby's research is likely to have been interpreted in a way which supports his own theory and would be very subjective. This suggests that the research is not valid and is a weakness of his findings.Another issue is that of inferring causation from correlation. Bowlby's study was primarily observational and so extranious variables could not be controlled. Furthermore, the research was conducted after the 44 thieves had committed their crimes, consequently Bowlby cannot determine whether the criminal tendencies began as a result of maternal deprivation. This further weakens the validity of Bowlby's findings and the overall study.

EB
Answered by Emily B. Psychology tutor

15484 Views

See similar Psychology A Level tutors

Related Psychology A Level answers

All answers ▸

Discuss evolutionary explanations of eating behaviour (6 marks)


Name the two types of social influence and why they lead to conformity


What is a 'nomothetic approach’? Suggest one limitation of a nomothetic approach. (2 marks)


Outline ONE strength and ONE weakness of the research method you described previously. (4 marks - Edexcel)


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2026 by IXL Learning