Translate the following sentences. 'Hannibal, nautas tali modo hortatus, iussit classem in proelium navigare. sed priusquam signum pugnae daretur, Hannibal, ut cognosceret quo loco Eumenes esset, tabellarium in scapha cum caduceo misit. '
In Paper 1A of the Latin GCSE exam, the students are asked to translate a text from Latin to English. This is a sentence from the 2013 Exam Paper.The correct translation is the following: 'Hannibal, having encouraged (past participle) the sailors (acc) in such a way, ordered (perf 3rd sg) the fleet to sail into battle. But before the sign could be given (priusquam+subj imperf indicates potentiality), Hannibal sent (perf 3rd sg) a courier in a skiff with a white flag to find out where Eumenes was (ut+subj is a final clause)'. I have provided a grammatical analysis of some Latin verbs and sentences in the brackets.
LC
Related Latin GCSE answers
All answers ▸What is an indirect command?
Choose two words from the following list and for each one give an English word derived partly or wholly from the same root: scribere, vulnerato, accepisset, amici, captivi. [2]
Why are different cases of the personal pronoun use in the two parts of the sentence "si enim amici me in caelo videbunt, omnes tandem mihi credent" and what do they mean?
'dux militibus imperavit ut summa virtute pugnarent.' What construction is this? Parse 'militibus' and explain why it is like this. With the same construction, rewrite this sentence using 'iubeo' instead of 'imperare'.