Were economic factors the driving force behind imperial expansion during the Age of 'New Imperialism' c1870-1914?

Historians such as J Hobson, and Marxist writers eg Lenin, have all argued that economic factors were the driving force behind imperial expansion. The effects of the industrial revolution and the consequent oversupply of goods for domestic markets, according to the aforementioned historians, necessitated colonial acquisition as a means of obtaining access to foreign markets. This argument is known as the underconsumption theory and was developed by Hobson.Having said this, colonisation was not a simple process and involved many motivations. One significant factor was that of humanitarianism (in the eyes of the coloniser). Europeans believed that they had a duty to 'civilise' the Orient. This was dubbed the mission civilisatrice and originated in France- Jules Ferry was very prominent. Civilising involved bringing the benefits of Western institutions and practice to the colonies. eg Christianity, democracy etc

TB
Answered by Thomas B. History tutor

1840 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

How to I determine what the driving force was in Henry VIII divorce with Catherine of Aragon in 1532


Military action was the most important method used by Germany and Italy to pursue their foreign policies from 1933. How valid is this view?


How accurate is it to say that the Pilgrimage of Grace of 1536 was a reaction to Henry VIII's dissolution of the monasteries?


(edexcel style A-level) To what extent was leadership the main reason for the failure of chartism during the years 1839 — 1849?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences