Explain one strength and one weakness of the flooding phobia treatment (4)

One strength is that it have proven to be effective. Wolpe (1973) found that when he placed a girl who was scared of cars in a car, she was distressed and fearful at first but eventually calmed down. Similarly, Mott (2013) looked at PTSD and found that 85% of symptoms were reduced after a session of flooding. Thus, it is effective and helps to reduce fears. One weakness is that it is unethical compared to systematic desensitisation as the individual has no control and cannot leave if they are too scared. They are put under immense distress and can be left with lasting effects of this distress. For example, Barrett (1969) gave a girl a session of flooding who was scared of snakes. She associated the snakes with closing her eyes and could never sleep again after the session as she saw snakes when her eyes were closed. Thus, it isn’t always effective and the unethical nature leaves participants distressed.

Answered by Melissa S. Psychology tutor

9957 Views

See similar Psychology A Level tutors

Related Psychology A Level answers

All answers ▸

How would you answer an essay question on the behavioural approach to treating phobias?


What is Bowlby’s Evolutionary Theory of Attachment


What are the limitations of using Informed Consent in a study? And how do researchers overcome this?


What are the three most common types of experimental design?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2024

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences