Discuss the reforms made to the judicial appointments system and how the judiciary aims to promote diversity.

The manner in which members of the judiciary are appointed was changed with the introduction of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC). Prior to this, the decision remained with the Lord Chancellor. The JAC played an important role in promoting the perception of independence for the public as appointments were made in line with a legalised and codified process. The criteria are widely advertised, and require a high level of expertise in the relevant area of law, integrity and independence of mind. The JAC remain independent of the government and must include lay, judicial and professional members. In 2013, Lord Neuberger, who at the time was the President of the Supreme Court stated that the judiciary is subject to a 'diversity shortfall'. This is contrary to the underlying principles of justness, fairness and equality in the Judge's Oath. Currently, in the higher judiciary, only 14% are women and 3% BME. In comparison, the tribunals are more diverse, comprised of 44% women and 12.5% BME. This indicates that there is an issue with ensuring diversity remains throughout the judiciary, particularly towards the more senior end of the court system. Diversity is fundamental for the judicial system, as it facilitates a greater range of views on issues and can contribute to public confidence. As such, steps have been taken to promote diversity. This includes the JAC being encouraged to facilitate a diverse judiciary, though not at the expense of merit, whilst Baroness Hale (a Supreme Court judge) believes that gender and race should be taken into account when considering appointments.