• ‘Plutarch’s biography of Alexander shows a greater understanding of the wider issues than Arrian’s more detailed history’. How far do you agree? Refer to both Arrian and Plutarch.

Emphasis on Alexander’s childhood shows Plutarch’s greater understanding of Alexander as it explores his background and gives an indication of what drove Alexander to become the man who conquered the Persian Empire. The beginning of Plutarch’s account looks at the birth of Alexander and implies his divine character; a recurring theme throughout Plutarch’s biography that he places significant emphasis upon when discussing the success and prowess of Alexander as a king. Arrian’s account, on the other hand says nothing about Alexander’s childhood. Unlike Plutarch’s biography, Arrian’s account is more of a military history which is concerned solely with the campaigns of Alexander and so the account starts with Alexander’s accession to the Macedonian throne. § Personality of Alexander – divine/demi-god or human§ Campaigns throughout Persia and beyond§ Death

Related Classical Civilisation A Level answers

All answers ▸

How did the role of the tribunate change across the Late Republic?


'Odysseus is only motivated by his desire to return home'. How far do you agree with this view?


‘IMPRESSIVE BUT NOT VERY PRACTICAL.’ DO YOU THINK THIS APPLIES MORE TO THE BUILDINGS AND LAYOUT OF THE SANCTARY OF ZEUS AT OLYMPIA OR THE SANCTUARY OF APOLLO AT DELPHI? (25 MARKS)


To what extent is Odysseus a good leader?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences