Is it better when analysing a passage to make point thematically or chronologically?

There is no right or wrong way of setting out your analysis. As long as every point has a topic sentence, a quote or reference in order to back up your statement, and an analysis of how this quote relates back to the question it will get credit.
A-Level literature exams are generally time pressured so I would personally recommend approaching a passage chronologically. This means that you do not waste valuable time trying to find good quotes and potentially losing your train of thought. It is vital, however, that you talk about elements throughout the passage. There is a risk that you will go too in-depth at the start of the passage and leave out the second half. Make sure that you have your main points down and then you can go back and add in smaller points.

AB

Related Latin A Level answers

All answers ▸

‘Tacitus’ historiography seeks to establish an accurate and impartial presentation of the principate’ discuss.


How do you construct indirect commands for prose composition?


Politics and prejudice, rather than reasoned argument, are the dominant forces in the Pro Milone.’ To what extent do you agree with this judgement?


In ref to Ovid, Met. 1.525-565: "I understand the language of this passage, but how would I answer a commentary/thematic questions on it in the exam?