Give two reasons why the ratio decidendi of a case is sometimes difficult to determine. Use case law to illustrate your reasons. (4 Marks)

First, judgments are often written in a complex, discursive fashion. It can be difficult to determine the main point that a judge is trying to make. In Woollin, it is unclear from the leading judgement whether foresight of virtually certain death or serious injury supplies the mens rea of murder, or is merely evidential.
Second, there may be several judgments, agreeing with one another, but using different reasoning to come to this conclusion. An example of this is DPP v Majewski, in which Lord Elwyn-Jones seems to suggest that voluntary intoxication can supply the mens rea for crimes of basic intent, but this idea is not present in Lord Simon's reasoning.

Answered by Tom H. Law tutor

4281 Views

See similar Law A Level tutors

Related Law A Level answers

All answers ▸

How do I answer a problem question on negligence?


How do I know the difference between Murder and Manslaughter in scenarios?


How will I help you achieve highly in law?


Write a critical analysis of the law on voluntary manslaughter.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2024

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences