How successful was the Treaty of London of 1518 in fulfilling Henry VIII’s aims in foreign policy?

Whilst it may have appeared in the beginning that the Treaty of London - an international non-aggression pact which involved over twenty European rulers - satisfied Henry’s desire to put England at the forefront of the European stage, it was short-lived. When Emperor Maximilian died a mere four months later in 1519, and Charles V succeeded him, a huge shift in power changed the diplomatic situation. Charles, young and confident, entered into a longstanding enmity with Francis I of France with the intention of claiming supremacy over Europe; England in its role of peacekeeper became irrelevant once more. Due to their lack of experience in the nuanced field of foreign politics, both Henry and Wolsey were slow to anticipate the rapid changes in authority between the two powers. The Treaty of London therefore did not retain for Henry a significant role in Europe, with France and Spain undermining its core aims, hence it was unsuccessful in fulfilling Henry’s aims. 

ES
Answered by Evie S. History tutor

16769 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

How do you answer a ‘how far do you agree with the statement’ question?


Shall I include a counter-argument within my History essays or just argue one view?


Explain the effect of the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and 1689.


‘Henry’s treatment of his sons was a more important cause of the Great Rebellion than his baronial policy.’


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences