How successful was the Treaty of London of 1518 in fulfilling Henry VIII’s aims in foreign policy?

Whilst it may have appeared in the beginning that the Treaty of London - an international non-aggression pact which involved over twenty European rulers - satisfied Henry’s desire to put England at the forefront of the European stage, it was short-lived. When Emperor Maximilian died a mere four months later in 1519, and Charles V succeeded him, a huge shift in power changed the diplomatic situation. Charles, young and confident, entered into a longstanding enmity with Francis I of France with the intention of claiming supremacy over Europe; England in its role of peacekeeper became irrelevant once more. Due to their lack of experience in the nuanced field of foreign politics, both Henry and Wolsey were slow to anticipate the rapid changes in authority between the two powers. The Treaty of London therefore did not retain for Henry a significant role in Europe, with France and Spain undermining its core aims, hence it was unsuccessful in fulfilling Henry’s aims. 

Answered by Evie S. History tutor

15252 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

To what extent was Charles II's reign characterised by short term success but long term failure in the years 1660-1685?


Explain whether you agree or disagree with the statement ' Henry VIII never seriously abandoned the Catholic faith in the years 1529 to 1547'


'Edmond is clearly a villain, but he is also by far the most attractive character we meet.' Discuss.


Why was Bismarck such an important figure?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo
Cookie Preferences