How far are modern liberals willing to go in endorsing social and economic intervention?

Modern liberals had no qualms with claiming that a larger state was the solution to the new socio-economic threats to freedom and individualism. I.e. John Rawls justified an extension of the state in the name of individual liberty: more laws, more spending, more taxation and more bureaucracy. Rawls insisted that while an enlarged state would require some individuals to sacrifice more of their earnings to the state in the form of progressive taxation, those same individuals could still be persuaded that this was a good and necessary thing. Therefore the ‘enabling state’ was consistent with the liberal principle of government by consent.

Answered by Samuel J. Politics tutor

2617 Views

See similar Politics A Level tutors

Related Politics A Level answers

All answers ▸

How can we analyse the differences between political ideologies?


Why do only a small percentage of bills introduced into Congress become laws? (15)


How do Presidents veto legislation, and how significant is the presidential veto?


What is the difference between pluralism and elitism?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences