Discuss the presentation of marriage betrothals in the ‘problem’ plays Measure for Measure and All’s Well That Ends Well

Shakespeare’s presentation of marriage in Measure for Measure and All’s Well That Ends Well is one of many issues that audiences throughout the years have deemed ‘problematic’ (Frederick Boas, 1895), yet it displays a very real complexity in the contention between the law and the church, consent and contract, or even the specifics between de futuro and de praesenti betrothals that faced engaged couples in Elizabethan England. John Wasson writes that ‘many scholars have observed that the title of Measure for Measure is a misnomer: Angelo does not get his just deserts, his injustice being answered with mercy’. What both plays seem to enforce is equity over retribution— the Duke says ‘shame to him [the judge] whose cruel striking / Kills for faults of his own liking!’ (3.2), suggesting that true justice must be impartial. It is hard for the audience, however, to be impartial and perhaps a true judge like the Duke requires a little moral dubiosity in order to be impartial to Angelo’s actions. The sense of resolution comes with the fulfilment of contracts, and the plays’s ‘comic’ endings are defined by the marriages, but Shakespeare never resolves the underlying unsettlement— after all, a reader can’t ignore Isabella’s silence and lack of verbal consent to the Duke’s proposal, ‘give me your hand and say you will be mine’. 

Answered by Cassandra N. English tutor

1586 Views

See similar English A Level tutors

Related English A Level answers

All answers ▸

How do I analyse quotes in an essay?


Compare and contrast the American view of Paris in ‘On Paris’ by Hemingway and ‘The Sweet Life in Paris.’


How do I analyse a poem?


How should I approach an unseen poetry question in my exam?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo
Cookie Preferences