How does Shakespeare critique colonisation in The Tempest?

In The Tempest, Shakespeare establishes a dichotomy between the oppressor, Prospero, and his slave, Caliban, in order to provoke sympathy for the enslaved. Whereas Prospero is all-powerful and assumes control of the island with his magical powers, Caliban has no choice to submit and renounce his own culture. The brutality of colonialism is captured in Caliban's complaint that, 'for every trifle are they [Prospero's spirits] set upon me', as it highlights how Prospero micro-manages Caliban's behaviour and punishes him even for minor transgressions. This is influenced by the context of Spain's colonisation of the New World, during which Spanish settlers would monitor the amount of rare metals that each slave found, with the least 'efficient' slaves being dismembered. Moreover, Shakespeare exposes the prejudice of Western ideology when Prospero calls Caliban, 'a born devil, on whose nature nurture can never stick', as it suggests that Caliban is fundamentally incapable of achieving moral virtue. Yet Prospero, and thus colonisers, are undercut here through the irony created: the irony that Prospero does not realise he is exhibiting more devilish behaviour than Caliban ever did.

Related English Literature A Level answers

All answers ▸

By comparing the presentation of characters, in “A Streetcar Named Desire” and “The Catcher in the Rye”, explore how writers present characters struggling with the loss of innocence in post-war America.


To what extent is Owen Sheer's Skirrid Hill a collection defined by separation?


In Scene IV of the Poker Night in Tennessee Williams' A Streetcar Named Desire, what is the significance of the use of primary colours in the setting of the Kowlaski Apartment?


How do I structure my essay?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo
Cookie Preferences