How useful are introductions and conclusions?

This is always a divisive issue as some will tell you they're great and others that they're not necessary, and in the end it tends to depend on where you're using them and what for. Ultimately, I would say this: don't use an introduction to set up the context or waste time with darting around issues but be decisive. Your introduction should be brief. In an exam you don't have time to lose so make sure that you address a couple of key points very quickly but make your judgement absolutely clear from the get go. Address the key words in the question such as "extent" or "how far" and don't dance around your decision. In the same way you must continue the essay in the same vein and don't change your judgement by the end. Likewise, your conclusion ought to be brief and cover key points that you made in your discourse but ultimately reinforcing with incredible clarity your judgement. 

DE

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

How do I evaluate the usefulness/ reliability of a source?


Practice exam question AS History, how would we structure an answer: How far do you agree that Stalin's position as General Secretary was the most significant factor in the defeat of his political opponents in the years 1924- 29?


'The main reason that the US pursued a policy of containment since 1946 was ideological.' Explain why you agree or disagree with this view


How absolute was the monarchy under Louis XIV?